Who is in Charge?
March 27th, 2009 - byIn the midst of the most recent alleged recruiting violations that have plagued college athletics, I came across this article on a Michigan State Website. The article was sparked by a reported recruiting violation that took place at UCONN involving a student-athlete who is not even a member of the current team. I do not really care to discuss the actual violation because to be honest, it doesn’t really interest me that much…I can attribute this immunity to being forced to deal with the Kelvin Sampson mess at Indiana as an alumni of the University. However, one question that the article debates is this:
“Who should do the policing? Coaches? The NCAA? Respective Universities?”
The article asks prominent coaches for their varied opinions… while I am still in shock that we even have to ask that question. How can we expect the rules to be followed when there is a debate about who is doing the policing?
The easy answer is the NCAA, but as Rick Pitino put it, “the NCAA is sort of like the IRS, like the border patrol. They’re undermanned.” Tom Izzo added to the ineptitude of the NCAA by saying, “the NCAA cannot chase down recruiting violators.
It’s too big of a problem. The more money we make, the bigger the problem is,”
So basically, the governing body in charge is incapable of policing the very rules that they have created? No wonder we have a mess on our hands…
I will not even begin to acknowledge the possibility of the coaches policing themselves since the notion itself makes me laugh out loud. How many people would go the speed limit if there were never police officers on the roads?
That leaves the universities. Unfortunately, their main function should be to educate the thousands of students attending the school to earn a degree. They should not be allocating resources to check Bill Self’s cell phone record to see how many text messages he sent in the month of January…
I believe part of the problem lies in the ambiguity of rules. They are written in a manner that leaves them open to interpretation which is never a good thing. That would be like telling people that, “You have to drive the speed limit only on a day of the week ending in the letter “y” when it’s raining…or sunny.” What?
I believe the entire rulebook needs to be rewritten in a way that is clear and definitive. I realize technology changes the ways that coaches can recruit and amendments would have to be added, but the current system clearly isn’t working…let’s start over.
On top of that, I would make all rules, regulations, and timelines universal across all sports. Why can a women’s basketball recruit receive a phone call earlier in her high school career than her friend, who is the same age, and happens to play softball? I firmly believe it would be easier to police the rules if they were exactly the same for all sports.
There is no easy answer. Violations will always happen regardless of who is policing and how the rules are written. I just think it would be nice to actually know who is in charge…
their goal. That student will begin studying well in advance with test preparation and work as hard as they can to put themselves in a position to reach the perfect score. The comforting fact for that student is that there is not limit on the number of 2400′s given out on the SAT. Although a perfect score is extremely rare, technically every single student taking the test could receive a 2400. As I mentioned, this is an example when everyone can be as successful as they desire without the efforts of others holding them back.
only viable option to play college ball, that number is less than .08%. Not even 1%!
basketball players, but you can take a lot of these principles and apply them to all recruit able athletes. Here is part of what Coach McGraw says she looks for:
