Its firing season for college football coaches. Coaches across the country are being let go for a lack of success on the gridiron. However, should this be the case? Shouldn’t these coaches be held to academic standards rather than simply winning percentages? ESPN’s Gregg Easterbrook focuses this week’s Tuesday morning Quarterback on tackling two myths about college athletes.
1) Football players at large universities don’t need to focus on academics because they are in effect taking vocational training for the NFL.
2) Academic “Smart” Schools can’t do well in sports . If a school wants to win it must dumb down their own standards.
Perhaps you’re thinking, first, football players at big colleges are not being taken advantage of because they are being prepped for the NFL; and second, academics-oriented “smart schools” don’t do well in sports, so if a college wants to win, standards must be low. Both of those assumptions are wrong.
Prepped for the NFL? Each year, roughly 2,500 Division I football players leave college because they have exhausted their athletic eligibility, or are leaving early, or have graduated. Each year, about 200 rookie players make NFL rosters. Thus, more than 90 percent of Division I football players never play a down in the NFL. Take into account that some of the NFL rookies are Division II, Division III or NAIA players, and it’s closer to 95 percent. Watch any top college football team — the players are fast, muscular, and obviously devote tremendous amounts of time and energy to football. Ninety-five percent of them won’t play in the NFL. If they don’t study and don’t go to class, they walk away from college football practically empty-handed.
A quick analysis of a few of the top teams from the last decade proves this assumption false as well. Okalahoma, the 2000 BCS champions, sent only 11% of their players to the NFL. Only two played 5 years or more. The 2001 Miami Hurricanes, considered one of the most talented teams of all time, sent an amazing 20 players to the NFL who played 5 years or more. Still, for all their talent almost two thirds of the team never played a down in the NFL. If these were considered vocational training programs they would earn failing grades.
Notre Dame was among the few prominent holdouts, insisting its football players be students too. This generated a recruiting disadvantage — and a recruiting disadvantage caused by high standards, not Weis suddenly forgetting how to coach, is the reason for the recent records of Notre Dame football. Notre Dame alums and boosters should have been proud that high standards keep the school from going 12-0!
What about the other commonly heard claim — that “smart schools” can’t win in football and men’s basketball? Cal, Georgia Tech, Navy, Nebraska, Northwestern, Stanford and TCU — all academics-first colleges where football players are more likely to attend class — are on their way to bowl games. Most of them have been in the top 20 nationally this season, and Georgia Tech and TCU even made BCS bowls. Notre Dame would be headed for a bowl game too, if it weren’t for athletic director Jack Swarbrick’s bizarre notion that winning “only” six games is something to be embarrassed about. Villanova and William & Mary just met in the Football Championship Subdivision playoffs, while Coe, Illinois Wesleyan and Johns Hopkins made the Division III playoffs. Penn and Amherst also would have advanced to the playoffs, if the Ivy League and the New England Small College Athletic Conference did not prohibit member schools from sending their football teams to the postseason. It is simply not true that colleges where football players study hard and go to class can’t have winning seasons.
Is this autumn some kind of fluke? No. Last year, Boston College, Cal, Georgia Tech, Navy, North Carolina, Northwestern, Notre Dame, Rice, TCU, Vanderbilt and Wake Forest made bowls. Colgate, Villanova and Wofford made the Football Championship Subdivision playoffs, while Case Western, Occidental and Wheaton of Illinois made the Division III postseason. Harvard and Trinity (Conn.) would have made the playoffs, except for Ivy League and NESCAC rules. All these are academics-come-first schools.
NCSA has always worked to educate student-athletes and families that they could receive both a world class education and an incredible athletic experience. It is one of the main reasons we created the NCSA Power Rankings to factor the NCAA Directors Cup, US News and World Report Rankings, and Athletic Graduation Rates. The rankings are a simple tool to educate families that these commonly held myths are simply untrue.