Get Started Now
Parents Start Here Athletes Start Here

2019 NCSA State of Recruiting Report

NCSA College Recruiting’s 2019 NCSA State of Recruiting report examines the current college athletic recruiting landscape and identifies key trends impacting student-athletes, parents and coaches.

Download the full report here »

Examining the state of college athletic recruiting

The 2019 State of Recruiting report explores major themes in college athletic recruiting including athlete retention, regional recruiting trends, recruit desirability and parents’ impact on the recruiting process.

Report findings are based on the results of a national survey administered by NCSA to approx. 12,000 student-athletes, 7,500 parents, 1,000 club coaches, 1,100 high school coaches and 500 college coaches, as well as analysis of college roster data from 1,400 schools between 2012 and 2017 – including 365 Division 1, 284 Division 2, 472 Division 3 and 279 NAIA teams.

College fit matters: Nearly half of current college athletes leave their team roster 

Individual research at colleges and universities reaffirms this trend. In 2016, the Brown Daily Herald published a report stating that about 30% of its athletes choose not to continue playing their sport through their senior year. And Ithaca College said its 2014 class maintained just a 46% retention rate for four-year athletes. 

NCSA analyzed the college roster data of over 1,400 schools across NCAA D1, D2, D3 and NAIA divisions between 2012 and 2017 and found that over 45% of underclassmen athletes are not listed on their college roster the following year.

When student-athletes choose to leave their team, they lose more than the comradery of their teammates. Athletes lose valuable academic support and guidance. NCAA’s 2016 GOALS Study of the Student-Athlete Experience reported more than two-thirds of student-athletes develop a close personal relationship with at least one faculty member, while more than 80% believe their coach cares whether they graduate. Without a built-in support system, athletes are more susceptible to dropping out.

NCAA research has consistently shown that student-athletes graduate at higher rate than the general student body. The NCAA estimates college graduation rate for student-athletes are 88% for D1, 71% for D2 and 87% for D3. However, NCAA numbers do not incorporate athletes who leave their college team in good academic standing. Alternatively, college graduation rate for non-student-athletes is only 68%. This means staying on a college team is critical to increasing an athlete’s likelihood of graduating. 

A number of factors can contribute to an athlete’s decision to leave their college roster. While many assume transfers are the most common reason for an athlete to leave their team, NCAA research shows only 6.7% of student-athletes transfer (based on a 2018 report of four-year college transfers on Division 1 teams). Additionally, studies have shown students who transfer typically take longer to earn their degree and often incur additional tuition costs.

2013 study of Division 2 student-athletes found that “relationships with the head coach, satisfaction with the athletic department, team success, personal reasons, academic concerns and player development” are common factors that lead to retention or withdrawal from athletic participation. 

NCSA is committed to helping all student-athletes find their best college fit. We define fit as a student-athlete staying on their college team and getting their degree. When an athlete finds the right school, they are more likely to remain committed to their sport, continue their education and ultimately graduate with a degree.

Does college fit really matter? According to our research, it makes all the difference. NCSA compared student-athletes who find their school through NCSA to student-athletes who did not use NCSA and found that overall, NCSA athletes are 18% more likely to stay on their team roster each year than non-NCSA athletes. While results varied by sport, data showed NCSA athletes consistently stayed on their team roster longer than non-NCSA athletes.

In order to identify the states with the most opportunities for collegiate athletes, NCSA compiled and analyzed the college rosters of 1,400 schools across NCAA D1, D2, D3 and NAIA divisions.

The NCAA estimates there are approximately 480,000 collegiate athletes across D1, D2 and D3. In addition, the NAIA reports roughly 65,000 athletes amongst its schools. NCSA’s analysis of 1,400 NCAA and NAIA schools incorporates roughly 71% of all collegiate athletes found on team rosters in 2017.  

Based on our data, NCSA found that Pennsylvania attracts the most college athletes overall, with 31,427 in 2017. 

What attracts so many student-athletes to the Keystone State? Pennsylvania is home to a high number of schools: 45 public four-year institutions and 129 private colleges. In fact, Pennsylvania’s 61 D3 schools are second only to New York’s 65 and the largest portion of college student-athletes can be found competing at the D3 level. In total, Pennsylvania schools currently maintain 639 men’s and women’s varsity athletic programs: 92 D1 teams, 140 D2 teams, 390 D3 teams and 17 NAIA teams. What’s more, this number of programs includes 17 men’s and women’s ice hockey teams. Many states don’t have any college ice hockey programs, which gives Pennsylvania an edge in roster numbers.

A 2015 study showed that, thanks to advances in technology and coach-to-athlete communication, more and more schools are recruiting outside state lines. Technology in athletic recruitment has allowed both athletes and coaches to gain exposure. Prior to the use of technology, “unless a top high school athlete in the state or region,” the report states, “having coaches reach out to a prospect was rare.”

So, exactly where do states recruit from? Our analysis of over 120,000 student-athletes on 2017 college rosters found that Texas had the highest percentage of in-state student-athletes, with 77% coming from within the Lone Star State. Athletes hoping to play out-of-state may have the best luck looking in Massachusetts, where nearly 59% of its college athletes were from outside of state lines.

most popular states athletes choose college

College coaches value a recruit’s character over athletic ability

When it comes to college sports, our survey shows college coaches care more about an athlete’s character than their skills and athleticism. When asked to rank the following qualities in an athlete—character, athletic ability, academics, location—surveyed coaches put character first, while athletic ability and academics tied for second. 

While college coaches still care about athletic ability—they typically only reach out to athletes who meet their standards—our study underscores the importance of character and coachability. Even if a recruit has outstanding stats and grades, coaches want to make sure they clear the character test before making an offer.

The results of 2018 survey by Verified Athletics showed that college coaches value athleticism and a strong highlight tape. However, the survey showed that leadership was the next highest rated attribute. College coaches said they prefer to take players that are captains of their high school team. In particular, D3 coaches put more emphasis on character qualities.

A 2006 report asked college coaches how they define character and found that coaches defined character as a combination of moral and social values like hard work, respect and honesty.

“I think watching athletes play and how they interact with their coaches, teammates and parents is the most valuable,” stated one college coach in NCSA’s survey. “It was [important] 10 years ago, and it still is today. Those interactions show a lot about the athlete’s character.”

While college coaches have traditionally evaluated an athlete through his actions on the field, college programs are increasingly using Twitter, Instagram and other social media accounts to evaluate a player’s character.

“Greatest tool for [coaches] right now is social media as it allows us to get a glimpse of the individual’s character,” said another surveyed college coach.

More and more college coaches have shared they’ve stopped recruiting an athlete because of his or her behavior on social media.

“Never let a 140 character tweet cost you a $140,000 scholarship,” warned Brandon Chambers, an assistant men’s basketball coach at Marymount (Virginia) University in a tweet.

NCSA’s survey reaffirms the importance of character traits like leadership and integrity in student-athletes and shows that coaches are looking at more than just their highlight video and transcript.

Parents are part of the package when it comes to recruiting

Across every sport, college coaches agree that parents can have a huge impact on an athlete’s recruiting process. On a scale from 1 to 10, surveyed coaches ranked the impact of parents on an athlete’s recruiting process as 8. 

Coaches want to get to know an athlete’s parents during camps and campus visits and may even observe parents in the stands to gauge their attitude. Supportive and encouraging parents can have a positive impact on an athlete’s process, while negative sideline behavior and helicopter parenting can scare away coaches. 

In 2014, the NCAA interviewed Division 1 coaches and administrators from Utah State University and Purdue University on perceptions of parent involvement in NCAA athletics and student-athletes. Their report found that “parent involvement is often seen as a vital asset to an athlete’s participation in sport.”  Specifically, “positive parent involvement was a key factor in achieving desired student-athlete outcomes through participation in intercollegiate athletics.” 

While coaches and administrators interviewed for the report emphasized the importance of parental support and involvement throughout an athlete’s career, “most also expressed concern that negative parental involvement is increasing in intercollegiate athletics, and importantly that it has the potential to inhibit student-athletes’ positive developmental experiences.”

“Helicopter parents” was one of the most common recruiting concerns from college coaches surveyed by NCSA. “Parental expectations and lack of knowledge are really harmful to student-athletes success,” said one coach.

Another 2015 study confirmed the influence of parents on student-athlete children and stated “it [is] possible for parents to be too involved, and that overinvolved parents can be a detriment to their child’s preparedness for college and their development.”

In fact, a 2013 report by the National Institutes for Health (NIH) found 30% of youth report negative actions of coaches and parents as their reason for quitting their sport.

As youth sports become more and more competitive, parents should use caution when engaging in the children’s sports and realize their actions can directly impact the student-athletes future. Our advice: focus on being your child’s biggest cheerleader rather than their biggest critic.

Greatest challenge in college athletic recruiting today: Athletes, parents and coaches worry about finding “the right fit”

When asked what the greatest challenge is in college athletic recruiting today, athletes, parents, high school, club and college coaches offered a variety of answers ranging from cost to complicated rules of the process. However, the theme of “right fit” was consistent throughout their responses.

College coaches said athletes often focus on “finding the best deal rather than the best fit.” Coaches urged athletes not to focus on finding the biggest scholarship or playing for the best team, but rather look for a school where they would benefit both athletically and academically.

“[The greatest challenge in recruiting is] helping players and parents realize that there is so much more out there that just a Division 1 school,” said a coach. “Too many people are more concerned about the image and their preconceived notion of what college athletics is. For the most part, people don’t realize how good the [sports] are that are being played at the D2, D3, NAIA, and NJCAA level.”  

Parents also emphasized the importance of finding a school that fit their child’s athletic and academic goals. Additionally, parents worried about finding a school that fulfills both the athlete’s and coach’s needs. Many parents said they struggle to understand what coaches are looking for. 

“It would be great to see, for example, if a college has a roster of prospects for a certain year, positions that are most likely filled and what […] they might be searching for,” said one parent.  

Athletes echoed the importance of finding a school that is mutually beneficial for the athlete and coach. However, many athletes stated that they are overwhelmed by options and didn’t know how to begin the recruiting process or even how to find their right fit.

“There are so many choices in colleges that all the colleges seem to blend together,” said an athlete. “Since all the websites of each of the colleges have about the same information, it’s hard to see which ones offer the best experience.”

Our report found several areas of confusion amongst athletes, parents and coaches engaging in the recruiting process. With almost half of current college athletes leaving their team rosters, it’s clear that there are mismatched expectations about recruiting.  

NCSA’s holistic approach to recruiting addresses these issues early on, helping athletes identify the schools that best fit their individual needs, understand what coaches want in a recruit and allow student-athletes to maintain control of their recruiting process by limiting parental interference. 

There are thousands of opportunities for student-athletes to compete in college athletics. No matter the sport or division, NCSA helps all athletes overcome the challenges of college athletic recruiting and find the right fit to be successful both on and off the field.

There are thousands of opportunities for student-athletes to compete in college athletics. No matter the sport or division, NCSA helps all athletes overcome the challenges of college athletic recruiting and find the right fit to be successful both on and off the field.

2019 State of Recruiting Report References

(in order of mention)

National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Scholarships 

National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (2018). NCAA Recruiting Facts 

National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (2018). Division II partial scholarship model 

National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). NCAA Scholarships and Grants 

NCSA College Recruiting. “Athletic Scholarships: Everything You Need to Know.” 

Shumate, Ben. “30% of athletes quit respective teams.” Brown Daily Herald.  April 28, 2016 

Gowdy, Kristen. “Hanging it up: Former student-athletes share their past athletic experiences.” The Ithacan. April 9, 2014 

National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (2016). Growth, Opportunities, Aspirations and Learning of Students in College (GOALS) Study 

National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (2018).Transfer Composition of Division I Teams 

U.S. Government Accountability Office (2017). Students Need More Information to Help Reduce Challenges in Transferring College Credits 

Weiss, Stephen, Robinson, Tracey (2013). An Investigation of Factors Relating to Retention of Student–Athletes Participating in NCAA Division II Athletics. The University of Calgary 

National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (2019). Estimated probability of competing in college athletics 

Tomar, David A. (2019). “A 50-State Look at Colleges and Universities in the U.S.” 

“Directory of Pennsylvania Private Colleges for 2019.” 

Berkman, Justin (2018). “The Complete List of NCAA D3 Colleges.”  

National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) (2018). NCAA Recruiting Facts 

“List of colleges and universities in Pennsylvania.” Wikipedia 

Thurston, Kaytlin Renee (2015). Recruiting without borders: The rise of technology in collegiate athletics. Appalachian State University 

Verified Athletics  (2018). What are College Coaches Looking for When Recruiting High School Athletes? 

Rudd, Andy, Mondello, Michael J. (2006). How Do College Coaches Define Character? A Qualitative Study with Division IA Head Coaches. Journal of College and Character

Associated Press. “Bad behavior on social media can cost student athletes.” CBS News. August 11, 2014

Patsko, Scott. “How social media behavior of high school athletes can negatively impact NCAA recruiting.” Northeastern Ohio Media Group, February 3, 2015 

Di Veronica, Jeff. “One bad tweet can be costly to a student athlete.” Democrat and Chronicle. September 11, 2014

Dorsch, T.E., Lowe, K. E., Dotterer, A.M. (2014). 2014 NCAA Innovations Grant 

Parietti, Megan (2015). Parental Influence on the Academic and Athletic Behaviors of Collegiate Student Athletes. The Ohio State University

Merkel, Donna L. (2013). Youth sport: Positive and negative impact on young athletes. U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health